Salvage Lopinavir-Ritonavir Therapy in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Children
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
- Vol. 23 (10) , 923-930
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.inf.0000142170.52155.7f
Abstract
To study the control of viral replication in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children on different salvage therapies. A retrospective observational study in 120 HIV-infected children was conducted. The children were divided into 3 groups according to their salvage therapies: (1) children receiving first line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART); (2) protease inhibitor-experienced children receiving second line HAART; (3) protease inhibitor-experienced children receiving HAART including lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r). The outcome variables examined were time to achieve viral load (VL) ≤400 copies/mL, success in achieving VL ≤400 copies/mL and time to virologic failure (VL >400 copies/mL). VL (HIV-RNA copies/mL) was quantified with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction molecular assay. For each protocol, survival analyses were conducted to determine the probability of achieving VL ≤400 copies/mL and rebound of VL. VL ≤400 copies/mL was achieved by 52.4% of children receiving first line HAART, 48.3% receiving second line HAART and 71.5% receiving HAART including LPV/r. Children receiving HAART including LPV/r reached VL ≤400 copies/mL in a shorter time than children receiving second line HAART (P = 0.017), but quite similar to children receiving first line HAART. In terms of adjusted relative risk, children receiving HAART including LPV/r were 3.36 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.59, 7.07] more likely to achieve VL ≤400 copies/mL than children receiving a different second line HAART. VL rebound occurred in 68.2% children receiving first line HAART, 73.4% receiving second line HAART and 32.4% receiving HAART including LPV/r. Children receiving HAART that includes LPV/r has less incidence of VL rebound (P=0.013) and 3.29 (95% CI 1.04, 10.3) times less risk to achieve a VL rebound than children receiving a different second line HAART. HAART that includes LPV/r is able to control HIV replication more efficiently than other classic salvage antiretroviral therapies.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Viral Load and CD4+ T Lymphocyte Response to Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected Children: An Observational StudyClinical Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Forty-eight-week evaluation of lopinavir/ritonavir, a new protease inhibitor, in human immunodeficiency virus-infected childrenThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2003
- Lopinavir/RitonavirDrugs, 2003
- Clinical use of lopinavir/ritonavir in a salvage therapy settingAIDS, 2002
- Salvage Treatment with Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Kaletra) in HIV-Infected Patients Failing All Current Antiretroviral Drug FamiliesHIV Research & Clinical Practice, 2002
- PENTA guidelines for the use of antiretroviral therapy in paediatric HIV infectionHIV Medicine, 2002
- Safety and Antiviral Activity at 48 Weeks of Lopinavir/Ritonavir plus Nevirapine and 2 Nucleoside Reverse‐Transcriptase Inhibitors in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1–Infected Protease Inhibitor–Experienced PatientsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Patterns of Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 RNA Response to Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy in Infected ChildrenThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Combination Therapy with Efavirenz, Nelfinavir, and Nucleoside Reverse-Transcriptase Inhibitors in Children Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1New England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- HIV-1 Dynamics in ChildrenJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 1999