An Empirical Comparison of Backtracking Algorithms
- 1 May 1982
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Vol. PAMI-4 (3) , 309-316
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.1982.4767250
Abstract
In this paper we report the results of experimental studies of zero-level, one-level, and two-level search rearrangement backtracking. We establish upper and lower limits for the size problem for which one-level backtracking is preferred over zero-level and two-level methods, thereby showing that the zero-level method is best for very small problems. The one-level method is best for moderate size problems, and the two-level method is best for extremely large problems. Together with our theoretical asymptotic formulas, these measurements provide a useful guide for selecting the best search rearrangement method for a particular problem.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Analysis of Backtracking with Search RearrangementSIAM Journal on Computing, 1983
- Average time analysis of simplified Davis-Putnam proceduresInformation Processing Letters, 1982
- Backtracking with multi-level dynamic search rearrangementActa Informatica, 1981
- AlternationJournal of the ACM, 1981
- The Consistent Labeling Problem: Part IIPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,1980
- The Consistent Labeling Problem: Part IIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1979
- Reduction operations for constraint satisfactionInformation Sciences, 1978
- Tree Size by Partial BacktrackingSIAM Journal on Computing, 1978
- Estimating the Efficiency of Backtrack ProgramsMathematics of Computation, 1975
- Reducibility among Combinatorial ProblemsPublished by Springer Nature ,1972