Incidence and methodologic aspects of the occurrence of liver metastases in recurrent breast cancer
- 15 April 1987
- Vol. 59 (8) , 1524-1529
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19870415)59:8<1524::aid-cncr2820590823>3.0.co;2-9
Abstract
The occurrence of liver metastases was evaluated by ultrasonic scanning and correlated with prognostic factors, pattern of metastases, clinical examination, biochemical liver function tests from serum, and liver biopsy specimens in 394 consecutive evaluable patients with first recurrence of breast cancer. Fifty-nine patients (15%) had a positive scan, and liver metastases were the only sign of recurrent disease in 11 of these patients. The presence of liver metastases was not associated with age, menopausal status, size of the primary tumor, regional lymph node status, or the length of the recurrence-free interval; but patients with liver metastases were significantly closer to the menopause than those without (P = 0.02). The diagnostic value of clinical examinations was comparable to that of serum bilirubin and serum aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) analyses, but was significantly better than alkaline phosphatase (AP) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) analyses. Analysis of serum AP was not a valuable diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of liver metastases, since it was elevated in 58% of the patients with bone metastases, and since metastases in this site were found in one third of the patients without liver metastases. If all four tests were negative, liver metastases were excluded in 99% of the patients, and if more than two of the four tests were positive, liver metastases were found in 95%. Valid (>80%) diagnosis of liver metastases by serum LDH or serum ASAT alone, required an elevation of three or five times the upper normal limits, respectively. Thirty-nine patients with positive ultrasonography results underwent biopsy. The ultrasonographic diagnosis could not be confirmed histologically in three patients (8%). If ultrasonic scanning had not been performed routinely, only one of 213 patients (0.5%) with soft tissue metastases would have been offered local therapy rather than systemic treatment. These data suggest that ultrasonic scanning of the liver should not be a routine diagnostic tool in examination of patients with first recurrence of breast cancer. However, whenever indicated by clinical signs or elevated blood tests, scanning should be performed to confirm the presence of liver metastases, particularly in patients entering therapeutical trials, since liver metastases demonstrated by ultrasound examinations may serve as a measurable parameter.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy of bone and liver scanning in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapyCancer, 1984
- Procedure and principles in ultrasonically guided punctureUltrasound in Medicine & Biology, 1984
- Oestrogen receptors, sites of metastatic disease and survival in recurrent breast cancerPublished by Elsevier ,1981
- Estrogen receptor: A prognostic factor in breast cancerCancer, 1981
- Is the investigation of patients with breast cancer for occult metastatic disease worth while?British Journal of Surgery, 1979
- Serum Alkaline Phosphatase DeterminationJAMA, 1979
- Prognostic Factors in the Initial Response to Therapy by Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer 2JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1978
- The pattern of spread and survival in 596 cases of breast cancer related to clinical staging and histological gradeClinical Radiology, 1976
- CONFIDENCE LIMITS IN EVALUATING CONTROLLED THERAPEUTIC TRIALSThe Lancet, 1973
- The Influence of Various Factors on Metastases in Carcinoma of the BreastBritish Journal of Cancer, 1953