Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: Strengths and limitations
- 1 April 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 6 (3) , 341-348
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780060325
Abstract
Methods for combining data from several studies exist and appear to be quite useful. None satisfactorily addresses the question of what studies should be combined. This issue is the most serious methodological limitation. Even studies with statistically significant interaction might still be combined if the effect were in the same direction. Thus, substantial scientific input is required as to what criteria must be met by each potential study. Much can be learned from combining or pooling data but it must be done cautiously. Pooling exercises do not replace well designed prospective clinical trials. Efforts for establishing basic design criteria to allow for multicentre and multicountry trials to be more easily combined might be useful.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985
- EFFECT ON MORTALITY OF METOPROLOL IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTIONThe Lancet, 1981
- Timolol-Induced Reduction in Mortality and Reinfarction in Patients Surviving Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Combining results of independent studies.Psychological Bulletin, 1978
- 237. Query: The Combination of ProbabilitiesPublished by JSTOR ,1967
- Combination of Results from Several 2 x 2 Contingency TablesBiometrics, 1965
- The Weighted Compounding of Two Independent Significance TestsThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1959
- Government of Canada Statistical ActivitiesThe American Statistician, 1959
- Conduct of Cooperative Field and Clinical TrialsThe American Statistician, 1959