Valsartan, a New Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist: A Double‐Blind Study Comparing the Incidence of Cough with Lisinopril and Hydrochlorothiazide
- 1 February 1997
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 37 (2) , 101-107
- https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1997.tb04767.x
Abstract
The present study compares the occurrence of a dry, persistent cough with doses of 80 mg of valsartan, 10 mg of lisinopril, or 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide in patients with a history of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor—induced cough. This was a randomized, double‐blind, active‐controlled, parallel group, multicenter trial involving 129 adult outpatients with essential hypertension. After confirmation of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor—induced cough during a 2 to 4 week challenge with lisinopril (followed by a washout period of 2 weeks), patients were randomized to receive 6 weeks of double‐blind treatment once daily with 80 mg valsartan, 10 mg lisinopril, or 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide. Assessments were made at baseline and after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment. Comparability of response to treatment was assessed by mean sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressure at the end of treatment. The occurrence of a dry, persistent cough was significantly less (P < 0.001) at 3 and 6 weeks with valsartan (19.5%) than with lisinopril (68.9%), with no significant difference between valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide (19.0%). There were no statistically significant differences in reduction of blood pressure among the three treatment groups. The overall incidence of adverse experiences, whether or not treatment‐related, was highest for lisinopril (86.7%) compared with valsartan (57.1%), and hydrochlorothiazide (61.9%). A dry cough in the lisinopril group accounted for this difference. There were no clinically significant changes in physical signs or in results of clinical laboratory evaluations during double‐blind treatment, except for from metabolic changes in 3 patients receiving hydrochlorothiazide. In hypertensive patients with a history of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor—induced cough, a single daily dose of 80 mg of valsartan produced therapeutic efficacy comparable to lisinopril but with significantly less cough.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: efficacy and safety compared to hydrochlorothiazideEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1997
- Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: efficacy and safety compared with placebo and enalaprilJournal Of Hypertension, 1996
- Angiotensin receptor antagonists: focus on losartanThe Lancet, 1995
- Comparison of the angiotensin II antagonist losartan with the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril in patients with essential hypertensionJournal Of Hypertension, 1995
- A randomized comparison of the effect of four antihypertensive monotherapies on the subjective quality of life in previously untreated asymptomatic patients: field trial in general practiceJournal Of Hypertension, 1995
- Angiotensin II receptor blockade with single doses of valsartan in healthy, normotensive subjectsEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1994
- The Fifth Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V)Archives of internal medicine (1960), 1993
- Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease: Part 2, short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological contextPublished by Elsevier ,1990
- Cough Associated with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme InhibitionJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1989
- MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: principal results. Medical Research Council Working Party.BMJ, 1985