Reexamination of Dependence of Plate Number on SDS Concentration in Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Analytical Chemistry
- Vol. 68 (23) , 4270-4280
- https://doi.org/10.1021/ac960501w
Abstract
Chromatograms of hydrophilic, hydrophobic, and intermediate-polarity analytes were developed in 50-μm capillaries by micellar electrokinetic chromatography at field strengths less than 31 kV/m. The analytes were solubilized by phosphate/borate buffers containing 15, 50, and 100 mM sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). The plate numbers N of the analytes, as well as those of the electroosmotic flow and micellar markers, were compared to predictions of N estimated by a simple model based on longitudinal diffusion and plug size. Good to fair agreement between theory and experiment was obtained for the hydrophilic and intermediate-polarity analytes in all buffers over the entire field strength range. Good agreement between theory and experiment was obtained for the hydrophobic analyte and micellar marker in all buffers at low field strengths; however, these compounds were subject to dispersion at higher field strengths by what appears to be Joule heating. The magnitudes of other, closely related Joule heating losses are quantified here using temperature profile measurements by Morris and co-workers and Taylor dispersion calculations. In contrast to the commonly reported increase of N with media concentration, the Ns of the hydrophilic and intermediate-polarity analytes were found to be essentially independent of SDS concentration over the investigated SDS range, and the Ns of the hydrophobic species were found to be independent of SDS concentration until (what appears to be) Joule heating became significant. These results were compared to those of Sepaniak and Cole. A critique of some previous studies of N vs SDS concentration is presented, in which quantitative explanations for some dispersions are offered as alternatives to surfactant concentration effects.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of Dodecyl Sulfate Counterion On Efficiency, Selectivity, Retention, Elution Range, and Resolution in Micellar Electrokinetic ChromatographyAnalytical Chemistry, 1995
- Evaluation of a Dual-Cyclodextrin Phase Variant of Capillary Electrokinetic Chromatography for Separations of Nonionizable SolutesAnalytical Chemistry, 1995
- Study of high‐field dispersion in micellar electrokinetic chromatographyElectrophoresis, 1995
- Spontaneous Injection in Microcolumn SeparationsAnalytical Chemistry, 1994
- Comparison of diffusion coefficients of multicomponent solutions from light scattering and macroscopic gradient techniques: sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles in aqueous salt solutionsThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1993
- Micellar Electrokinetic Capillary Chromatography with Cationic SurfactantsJournal of Liquid Chromatography, 1993
- Factors influencing performance in the rapid separation of aflatoxins by micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatographyTalanta, 1992
- Selected Organic Solvents as Electroosmotic Velocity Markers in Micellar Electrokinetic Capillary ChromatographyJournal of Liquid Chromatography, 1992
- Problems of quantitative injection in capillary zone electrophoresisAnalytical Chemistry, 1992
- Micellar electrokinetic chromatography of ionic compounds: The analysis of hop bitter acidsJournal of High Resolution Chromatography, 1991