Commitment in Married and Unmarried Cohabitation
- 1 October 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Sociological Focus
- Vol. 10 (4) , 367-374
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.1977.10570299
Abstract
In-depth interviews were conducted with 61 unmarried, cohabiting individuals matched by gender, social class, and length of acquaintence with 61 noncohabiting, engaged persons and 61 cohabiting married persons. The unmarried cohabiters were significantly less committed to marriage than were the engaged and the married respondents. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences between the cohabiting and engaged persons in personal (pair) commitment to their partners. Correlational analysis was used to determine the social and interactional correlates of personal commitment for each of the three criterion groups. Some interactional correlates were identical for two of the three groups, a finding which suggests some similarities in the structure of commitment across groups. Some differences were found between the cohabiting, engaged, and married groups. Differences, however, were also found in personal commitment between different kinds of cohabitors, i.e., those who described their relationships as a temporary involvement, a substitute for marriage, and as a preparation for marriage. These latter differences suggest that unmarried cohabiters should no longer be studied nor considered as a homogeneous group.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shacking up: Cohabitation in the 1970sJournal of Marriage and Family, 1977
- Personal and Family Characteristics of Cohabiting and Noncohabiting College StudentsJournal of Marriage and Family, 1974
- A Longitudinal Test of a Developmental Framework for Premarital Dyadic FormationJournal of Marriage and Family, 1973
- Heterosexual Cohabitation among Unmarried College StudentsThe Family Coordinator, 1972
- Living Together: An Alternative to MarriageJournal of Marriage and Family, 1972
- A Developmental Framework for the Analysis of Premarital Dyadic FormationFamily Process, 1972
- Trial Marriage: Harnessing the Trend ConstructivelyThe Family Coordinator, 1971
- The Future of the Family RevisitedJournal of Marriage and Family, 1967
- Value Consensus and Need Complementarity in Mate SelectionAmerican Sociological Review, 1962
- Mate Selection as the Development of a RelationshipMarriage and Family Living, 1961