Growing food crops on sludge‐amended soils: Problems with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency method of estimating toxic metal transfer

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The use of sewage sludges as farm fertilizers, encouraged in recent years by changes in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) policy, has raised concerns among some scientists regarding food safety and long‐term soil productivity. The U.S. EPA risk assessment for entry into the human diet of three of the most toxic metals, cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb), utilized uptake coefficients (UCs) to calculate the amount of each metal that could enter food crops from the soil. Each UC was calculated as the increment of metal concentration in the edible part of the crop per unit increase of metal loading to the soil. However, the final UC estimates employed in the risk assessment are biased toward low values by a number of factors. These include the use of geometric means to obtain single‐point averages of UCs for each crop group evaluated, rather than using arithmetic means or probabilistic methods, a systematic analytical or contamination error apparent in the reported metal concentrations of the control crops, and the fact that most of the UC values were derived for soils with pH 6 or higher. For more than 50% of all the soil and cropping conditions represented in the risk assessment, the geometrically averaged Cd UC values used by the U.S. EPA underestimated the actual risk posed by uptake into crops. The UC values for Pb and Hg are uncertain because of analytical or contamination errors, and because of the few data available for a number of crops. These uncertainties and biases in the risk assessment would advise a more cautious approach to agricultural and home garden use of sewage sludge than is permitted by the U.S. EPA 503 rule.

This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit: