The prevalence and causes of visual impairment in Tehran: the Tehran Eye Study
Open Access
- 1 June 2004
- journal article
- world view
- Published by BMJ in British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Vol. 88 (6) , 740-745
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2003.031153
Abstract
Aims: To determine the prevalence and causes of visual impairment in Tehran, Iran, through a population based study. Methods: In a population based, cross sectional study, 6497 Tehran citizens were sampled from 160 clusters using a stratified, random, cluster sampling strategy. The eligible people were enumerated through a door to door household survey in the selected clusters and were invited. All participants were transferred to a clinic for an extensive eye examination and interview. Visual impairment was determined using presenting and best corrected visual acuity (low vision: visual acuity of less than 6/18 to 3/60 in the better eye; blindness: visual acuity of less than 3/60 in the better eye). Results: Of those sampled, 4565 (70.3%) people participated in the study. The age and sex standardised prevalences of visual impairment on the basis of best corrected and presenting visual acuity were 1.39% (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07 to 1.71) and 2.52% (95% CI, 2.07 to 2.97), respectively. 15 people (0.28%; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.42) were blind with corrected vision while 22 (0.39%; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.56) were blind with presenting vision. Using the corrected and presenting vision, the prevalence of low visual impairment was 1.11% (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.39) and 2.13% (95% CI, 1.71 to 2.55), respectively. The causes of visual impairment according to the best corrected vision were cataract (36.0%), macular degeneration (20.0%), and amblyopia (10.7%). However, according to the presenting vision, uncorrected refractive errors were the most frequent primary cause (33.6%) and cataract (25.4%), macular degeneration (12.7%), and amblyopia (8.2%) were the other main causes of visual impairment in the study sample. The prevalence of visual impairment was associated with advancing age and lower education. Conclusion: The results indicate that the burden of visual impairment is important and, although easily preventable, uncorrected refractive errors and cataract have a major role as causes of visual impairment in this population. Results also highlight the need for visual impairment prevention programmes, with emphasis on treatment of refractive errors and cataract.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- The prevalence and causes of blindness in the Sultanate of Oman: the Oman Eye Study (OES)British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2002
- Prevalence of visual impairment in people aged 75 years and older in Britain: results from the MRC trial of assessment and management of older people in the communityBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2002
- Moderate visual impairment in India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease StudyBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2002
- Survey of blindness and visual impairment in Bioko, Equatorial GuineaBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2002
- Blindness in the eastern Mediterranean countriesBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2001
- Cause-specific prevalence of bilateral visual impairment in Victoria, AustraliaOphthalmology, 2001
- A population-based eye survey of older adults in a rural district of Rajasthan: I. Central vision impairment, blindness, and cataract surgeryOphthalmology, 2001
- Visual acuity measurements in a national sample of British elderly peopleBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2000
- Prevalence of Uncorrected Binocular Distance Visual Acuity in Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Adults: Results from the HHANES and the NHANES IOphthalmology, 1998
- Visual impairment and socioeconomic factorsBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 1997