Latency Variation in Human Pupil Contraction Due to Stimulus Luminance and/or Adaptation Level*
- 1 January 1969
- journal article
- Published by Optica Publishing Group in Journal of the Optical Society of America
- Vol. 59 (1) , 97-100
- https://doi.org/10.1364/josa.59.000097
Abstract
The purpose of this experiment is to measure the latency to onset of the contraction of the pupil, as a function of the size of positive steps in luminance, starting at various luminance levels to which the eye has been adapted prior to the stimulus steps. In the past, latency of the pupil response has been inaccurately measured, owing to the difficulty of separating the end of the latent period from the slow beginning of contraction. To overcome this, a digital curve-fitting technique involving a time delay followed by a modified second-order step response was developed. Latency was defined as the time delay giving the most accurate fit.Because the curve-fitting procedure needed a response with less random variation than is normally present, an average was used. Such averaging was first justified by using the standard deviation to show that there is probably no significant variation of latency for responses of a given subject under identical stimulus conditions. This analysis also showed that 20 responses is an efficient number to average for the pupil-contraction system.The excellent agreement between each average experimental response and the computed fit verified the value of delay used in the computation. Latency, thus defined for each stimulus condition, was found to be primarily a function of luminance during the step and only secondarily of the ratio of the step change of luminance to the adaptation luminance.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Pupil as Indicator of Retinal Activity*American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1964
- The Dependence of the Photopupil Response on Flash Duration and IntensityThe Journal of general physiology, 1963
- Perception lag as a function of stimulus luminanceVision Research, 1963
- THE NON‐LINEAR BIOLOGICAL DYNAMICS OF UNIDIRECTIONAL RATE SENSITIVITY ILLUSTRATED BY ANALOG COMPUTER ANALYSIS, PUPILLARY REFLEX TO LIGHT AND SOUND, AND HEART RATE BEHAVIOR*Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1962
- Stability, Oscillations, and Noise in the Human Pupil ServomechanismProceedings of the IRE, 1959
- Scotopic and Photopic Thresholds of the Pupillary Light Reflex in Normal Man*American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1959
- Effect of Stimulus Duration on Electrical Responses of the Human RetinaJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1956
- Effect of Flash and Field Luminance upon Human Reaction Time*Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1954
- Variations of the latent period of visionProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1954
- THE PERIPHERAL ORIGIN OF NERVOUS ACTIVITY IN THE VISUAL SYSTEMCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 1952