Trade Networks, Trade Blocs, and Hegemortic Conflict
- 1 October 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Sociological Inquiry
- Vol. 64 (4) , 415-437
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.1994.tb00400.x
Abstract
Most structural analyses of the world system have focused on distinguishing the core from the periphery and semiperiphery. This article extends the structural approach by identifying blocs and groupings in the world market. A network analysis of trade among the 102 countries with 1990 trade of U.S. $2 billion or more finds that the United States, Japan, and Germany are by far the most important countries in the trade network. The U.S. and Japanese trade blocs are highly overlapped, while the German trade bloc is largely separate. The 1990 trade patterns suggest the potential for, and possible shape of, increased trade conflict between rival world powers.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transnational CorporationsCurrent Sociology, 1990
- Was 1980 Special? A Comparison of 1980 and 1986 Corporate PAC ContributionsThe Sociological Quarterly, 1990
- The United States in the World EconomyPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1988
- Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural EquivalenceAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1987
- Power and Centrality: A Family of MeasuresAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1987
- Correcting the Trade DeficitForeign Affairs, 1987
- A Crisis of HegemonyPublished by Springer Nature ,1982
- Centrality in social networks conceptual clarificationSocial Networks, 1978
- The Intersection of Social CirclesSociological Methods & Research, 1976
- A graph‐theoretic definition of a sociometric clique†The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1973