Standardizing Methodologies for Economic Evaluation in Health Care: Practice, Problems, and Potential
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- general essays
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Vol. 9 (1) , 26-36
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462300003007
Abstract
There has been an exponential growth in the literature on economic evaluation in health care. As the range and quality of analytical work has improved, economic studies are becoming more influential with health care decision makers. The development of standards for economic evaluation methods would help maintain the scientific quality of studies, facilitate the comparison of economic evaluation results for different health care interventions, and assist in the interpretation of results from setting to setting. However, standardization might unnecessarily stifle methodological developments. This paper reviews the arguments for and against standardization, assesses attempts to date, outlines the main areas of agreement and disagreement on methods for economic evaluation, and makes recommendations for further work.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standards for the Socioeconomic Evaluation of Health Care ServicesPublished by Springer Nature ,1990
- IntroductionInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1989
- Quality-adjusted Life Years, Utility Theory, and Healthy-years EquivalentsMedical Decision Making, 1989
- Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting.BMJ, 1985
- Costt-Effectiveness of Antepartum Prevention of Rh ImmunizationClinics in Perinatology, 1984
- Dealing With Medical Practice Variations: A Proposal for ActionHealth Affairs, 1984
- WELFARE ECONOMICS AND COST BENEFT ANALYSIS IN HEALTH CARE1Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 1981
- Foundations of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Health and Medical PracticesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977