Comparative studies of risk perception: a review of twenty years of research
- 1 April 1998
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Risk Research
- Vol. 1 (2) , 135-163
- https://doi.org/10.1080/136698798377231
Abstract
This paper critically reviews a number of cross-national studies of perceptions of risks which have been conducted in accordance with the 'psychometric paradigm' developed by the Oregon research group in the 1970s. It considers attempts to study risk perception comparatively, from other theoretical and methodological perspectives, and discusses various issues that are highlighted in a comparative framework, relating to distinctions between 'objective' and 'perceived' risk, the role of communication and the media, the political system and various societal determinants such as marginality, gender and ethnicity. One of the main conclusions is that comparative studies of risk perception need to be further refined, both methodologically and theoretically.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- European Newspaper Readership: Structure and DevelopmentCommunications, 1997
- Social Organization and Risk: Some Current ControversiesAnnual Review of Sociology, 1993
- The Social Amplification of Risk: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical ApplicationsJournal of Social Issues, 1992
- Cultural TheoryAnthropologica, 1992
- Orienting Dispositions in the Perception of RiskJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1991
- Risk Perception and Social Acceptability of Technologies: The French CaseRisk Analysis, 1989
- The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual FrameworkRisk Analysis, 1988
- Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of SafetyJournal of the Electrochemical Society, 1976
- Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probabilityCognitive Psychology, 1973
- A Theory of Cognitive DissonanceThe American Journal of Psychology, 1959