What Have the New Definition of Acute Myocardial Infarction and the Introduction of Troponin Measurement Done to the Coronary Care Unit?
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Cardiology
- Vol. 102 (3) , 171-176
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000080487
Abstract
To assess the impact of the new American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology definition of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the introduction of troponin measurement on the coronary care unit (CCU). This was a retrospective cohort study performed in a tertiary care university hospital. All admissions to the CCU during the year before (period 1, year 2000, n = 1,134) and the year after (period 2, year 2002, n = 1,360) the introduction of troponin measurement and the new AMI definition were studied. We studied baseline characteristics, case load, distribution of admission diagnoses, management and outcome of patients in the two periods. There was a 20% increase in the number of CCU admissions, driven solely by a 141% increase in the burden of non-ST elevation AMI (NSTEMI) (p < 0.01). This increase was not a mere reflection of a change in diagnostic criteria, as the overall burden of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) (NSTEMI + unstable angina) increased by 46%, suggesting referral of many more patients to the CCU. Despite a 42% increase in the number of angiograms performed, the proportion of ACS patients who had an angiogram declined. AMI patients in period 2 were older and had higher rates of coronary risk factors but had a higher chance of receiving a guideline-based therapy. Length of CCU stay decreased by a whole day for all ACS patients. 30-day mortality for AMI patients did not change significantly. The new AMI definition had a dramatic impact on the CCU case load, case mix and length of stay and on the ability to provide early coronary angiography.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of changing diagnostic criteria on incidence, management, and outcome of acute myocardial infarction: retrospective cohort studyBMJ, 2003
- ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—summary articleJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- The New Definition of Myocardial InfarctionArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2002
- Multimarker Approach to Risk Stratification in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary SyndromesCirculation, 2002
- Differences in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction by troponin T compared with clinical and epidemiologic criteriaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2001
- Comparison of Early Invasive and Conservative Strategies in Patients with Unstable Coronary Syndromes Treated with the Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor TirofibanNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Myocardial infarction redefined—A consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial InfarctionEuropean Heart Journal, 2000
- Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre studyThe Lancet, 1999
- New Serum Markers for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Cardiac troponin I. A marker with high specificity for cardiac injury.Circulation, 1993