Use of Stimulated Serum Estradiol Measurements for the Prediction of Hyperresponse to Ovarian Stimulation in in Vitro Fertilization (IVF)
Open Access
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
- Vol. 21 (3) , 65-72
- https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jarg.0000027016.65749.ad
Abstract
Purpose: In ovarian stimulation an exaggerated ovarian response is often seen and is related to medical complications, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and increased patient discomfort. If it were possible to identify hyperresponders at an early stage of the stimulation phase, adaptation of the stimulation protocol would become feasible to minimize potential complications. Therefore, we studied the usefulness of measuring stimulated serum estradiol (E 2) levels in predicting ovarian hyperresponse. Methods: A total of 109 patients undergoing their first IVF treatment cycle using a long protocol with GnRH agonist was prospectively included. The E 2 level was evaluated on day 3 and 5 of the stimulation phase. Two outcome measures were defined. The first was ovarian hyperresponse (collection of ≥15 oocytes at retrieval and/or peak E 2 >10000 pmol/L, or cancellation due to ≥30 follicles growing and/or peak E 2 >15000 pmol/L, or OHSS developed). The second outcome measure comprised a subgroup representing the more severe hyperresponders, named extreme-response (cancellation or OHSS developed). Results: The data of 108 patients were analyzed. The predictive accuracy of E 2 measured on stimulation day 3 towards ovarian hyperresponse was clearly lower than that of E 2 measured on stimulation day 5 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROCAUC) 0.75 and 0.81, respectively). For extreme-response the predictive accuracy of E 2 measured on stimulation day 3 or 5 was comparable (ROCAUC 0.81 and 0.82, respectively). For both outcome measures the stimulated E 2 tests yielded only acceptable specificity with moderate sensitivity at higher cutoff levels. Prediction of extreme-response seemed slightly more effective due to a lower error rate. Conclusions: There is a significant predictive association between E 2 levels measured on stimulation day 3 and 5 and both ovarian hyperresponse and extreme-response in IVF. However, the clinical value of stimulated E 2 levels for the prediction of hyperresponse is low because of the modest sensitivity and the high false positive rate. For the prediction of extreme-response the clinical value of stimulated E 2 levels is moderate.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Day 5 inhibin B levels in a treatment cycle are predictive of IVF outcomeHuman Reproduction, 2002
- Differentiating clinical profiles: predicting good responders, poor responders, and hyperrespondersFertility and Sterility, 2001
- The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in miceHuman Reproduction, 2001
- Peripheral blood concentrations of inhibin B are elevated during gonadotrophin stimulation in patients who later develop ovarian OHSS and inhibin A concentrations are elevated after OHSS onsetHuman Reproduction, 2000
- Minimal ovarian stimulation for IVF: appraisal of potential benefits and drawbacksHuman Reproduction, 1999
- Serum vascular endothelial growth factor concentrations in in vitro fertilization cycles predict the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndromeFertility and Sterility, 1999
- Increasing uterine receptivity by decreasing estradiol levels during the preimplantation period in high responders with the use of a follicle-stimulating hormone step-down regimenFertility and Sterility, 1998
- Day 4 Estradiol Levels Predict Pregnancy Success in Women Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation for IVFFertility and Sterility, 1998
- Pretreatment transvaginal ultrasound examination predicts ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophins in in-vitro fertilizationHuman Reproduction, 1997
- Endocrinology: Prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome of baseline ovarian volume prior to stimulationHuman Reproduction, 1996