Reliability and predictive validity of contingent values: Does the nature of the good matter?
- 1 November 1990
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
- Vol. 19 (3) , 244-263
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(90)90072-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: Maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regressionJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1988
- Option price estimates for water quality improvements: A contingent valuation study for the monongahela riverJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1987
- Efficient Estimation Methods for "Closed-Ended" Contingent Valuation SurveysThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1987
- Market Transactions and Hypothetical Demand Data: A Comparative StudyJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete ResponsesAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1984
- Integrated acidification study (ILWAS): a mechanistic ecosystem analysisPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1984
- Belief relevance and attitude–behavior consistency: The moderating role of personal experience.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982
- Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1979
- Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research.Psychological Bulletin, 1977
- Estimating demand for public goods: An experimentEuropean Economic Review, 1972