Constraints on the variations of the fundamental couplings
- 23 August 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review D
- Vol. 66 (4) , 045022
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.66.045022
Abstract
We reconsider several current bounds on the variation of the fine-structure constant in models where all gauge and Yukawa couplings vary in an interdependent manner, as would be expected in unified theories. In particular, we reexamine the bounds established by the Oklo reactor from the resonant neutron capture cross section of By imposing variations in and the quark masses, as dictated by unified theories, the corresponding bound on the variation of the fine-structure constant can be improved by about 2 orders of magnitude in such theories. In addition, we consider possible bounds on variations due to their effect on long lived α- and β-decay isotopes, particularly and We obtain a strong constraint on comparable to that of Oklo but extending to a higher redshift corresponding to the age of the solar system, from the radioactive lifetime of derived from meteoritic studies. We also analyze the astrophysical consequences of perturbing the decay Q values on bound state β decays operating in the s process.
Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do the fundamental constants vary in the course of cosmological evolution?Astronomy Letters, 2002
- Evolution of the fine structure constant driven by dark matter and the cosmological constantPhysical Review D, 2002
- Behavior of varying-alpha cosmologiesPhysical Review D, 2002
- A Simple Cosmology with a Varying Fine Structure ConstantPhysical Review Letters, 2002
- Further Evidence for Cosmological Evolution of the Fine Structure ConstantPhysical Review Letters, 2001
- Does the Fine-Structure Constant Really Vary in Time?The Astrophysical Journal, 1998
- Time variation of fundamental constants: Bounds from geophysical and astronomical dataPhysical Review D, 1990
- Fine-structure constant: Is it really a constant?Physical Review D, 1982
- The equivalence of inertial and passive gravitational massAnnals of Physics, 1964
- Beiträge zum Gesetze der Proportionalität von Trägheit und GravitätAnnalen der Physik, 1922