Insider Trading, Outside Search, and Resource Allocation: Why Firms and Society May Disagree on Insider Trading Restrictions
- 1 July 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 7 (3) , 575-608
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/7.3.575
Abstract
We show that entrepreneurs may prefer to allow insider trading even when it is not socially optimal. We examine a model in which an insider/manager allocates resources on the basis of his private information and outside information conveyed through the secondary-market price of the firm's shares. If the manager is allowed to trade, he will compete with informed outsiders, reducing the equilibrium quality of outside information. While the benefits to production of outside information are the same for society and entrepreneurs, we show that the social and private costs are different. Thus, entrepreneurs and society may disagree on the conditions under which insider trading restrictions should be imposed.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Insider Trading and the Managerial Choice among Risky ProjectsJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1994
- Insider Trading in Financial Signaling ModelsThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- Insider Trading: Should It Be Prohibited?Journal of Political Economy, 1992
- Optimal Contracting and Insider Trading RestrictionsThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- Insider Trading and the Efficiency of Stock PricesThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1992
- The Harm From Insider Trading and Informed SpeculationThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1989
- A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price VariabilityThe Review of Financial Studies, 1988
- Continuous Auctions and Insider TradingEconometrica, 1985
- Inside Trading and IncentivesThe Journal of Business, 1984
- The Regulation of Insider TradingStanford Law Review, 1983