Systematic reviews: insufficient evidence on which to base medicine
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 105 (1) , 1-5
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09339.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Large-scale randomized evidence: Large, simple trials and overviews of trials”: Discussion. A clinician's perspective on meta-analysesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Meta‐analysis: Weighing the evidenceStatistics in Medicine, 1995
- Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: A meta-analysisObstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
- Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA, 1992
- Getting to grips with Archie Cochrane's agenda.BMJ, 1992
- Validation of an index of the quality of review articlesPublished by Elsevier ,1991
- Can meta-analyses be trusted?The Lancet, 1991
- Problems induced by meta‐analysesStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- Publication bias in clinical researchThe Lancet, 1991
- Effects of Electronic Fetal-Heart-Rate Monitoring, as Compared with Periodic Auscultation, on the Neurologic Development of Premature InfantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990