Determination of Retinal Correspondence
- 1 February 1967
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Ophthalmology (1950)
- Vol. 77 (2) , 200-213
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1967.00980020202010
Abstract
The concept that anomalous correspondence is more deeply rooted when more tests indicate its presence was subjected to experimental investigation and was found to be unsupported by the results. Two thirds of the (93) subjects showed the same diagnosis of retinal correspondence on at least four of five different tests. When there was diasgreement between the amblyoscope and afterimage tests, anomalous correspondence was found just as often on one test as on the other. Diagnostic disagreement between tests for retinal correspondence is adequately explained by measurement error, unsteady eccentric fixation, and change in position of the eyes.This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: