Group comparisons: imaging the aging brain
Open Access
- 30 August 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
- Vol. 3 (3) , 290-297
- https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsn029
Abstract
With the recent growth of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), scientists across a range of disciplines are comparing neural activity between groups of interest, such as healthy controls and clinical patients, children and young adults and younger and older adults. In this edition of Tools of the Trade, we will discuss why great caution must be taken when making group comparisons in studies using fMRI. Although many methodological contributions have been made in recent years, the suggestions for overcoming common issues are too often overlooked. This review focuses primarily on neuroimaging studies of healthy aging, but many of the issues raised apply to other group designs as well.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Investigation of spatial resolution, partial volume effects and smoothing in functional MRI using artificial 3D time seriesNeuroImage, 2008
- Individual Differences in Insular Sensitivity During Loss Anticipation Predict Avoidance LearningPsychological Science, 2008
- In praise of tedious anatomyNeuroImage, 2007
- Spatial normalization of lesioned brains: Performance evaluation and impact on fMRI analysesPublished by Elsevier ,2007
- Anticipation of monetary gain but not loss in healthy older adultsNature Neuroscience, 2007
- Region of interest analysis for fMRISocial Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2007
- Brain Aging and Its ModifiersAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2007
- The Influence of a Sense of Time on Human DevelopmentScience, 2006
- The BOLD Hemodynamic Response in Healthy AgingJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2004
- The Effects of Aging upon the Hemodynamic Response Measured by Functional MRINeuroImage, 2001