Policy Issues in a Non-Heart-Beating Donor Protocol
- 1 June 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Project MUSE in Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
- Vol. 3 (2) , 241-250
- https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.0.0098
Abstract
The Pittsburgh protocol is ethically and legally acceptable as written, but more research is needed to determine if it can be implemented in ways that will observe the procedures that make it ethically acceptable. If so, its desirability as public policy will depend on the number of organs it is likely to generate and its effects on public attitudes toward organ donation generally. In the final analysis, the controversial aspects of this protocol concern symbolic issues about respect for the dead and near dead, rather than substantive concerns that real patient interests will be harmed.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spare Parts: Organ Replacement in American Society.Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1993
- "An Ignoble Form of Cannibalism": Reflections on the Pittsburgh Protocol for Procuring Organs from Non-Heart-Beating CadaversKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1993
- Statutory Definitions of Death and the Management of Terminally Ill Patients Who May Become Organ Donors after DeathKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1993
- Non-Heart-Beating Donors of Organs: Are the Distinctions Between Direct and Indirect Effects & Between Killing and Letting Die Relevant and Helpful?Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1993
- Psychosocial and Ethical Implications of Organ RetrievalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985