Is human information processing conscious?
- 1 December 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Vol. 14 (4) , 651-669
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00071776
Abstract
Investigations of the function of consciousness in human information processing have focused mainly on two questions: (1) Where does consciousness enter into the information processing sequence, and (2) how does conscious processing differ from preconscious and unconscious processing? Input analysis is thought to be initially “preconscious” and “pre-attentive” - fast, involuntary, and automatic. This is followed by “conscious,” “focal-attentive” analysis, which is relatively slow, voluntary, and flexible. It is thought that simple, familiar stimuli can be identified preconsciously, but conscious processing is needed to identify complex, novel stimuli. Conscious processing has also been thought to be necessary for choice, learning and memory, and the organization of complex, novel responses, particularly those requiring planning, reflection, or creativity.The present target article reviews evidence that consciousness performs none of these functions. Consciousness nearly always results from focal-attentive processing (as a form of output) but does not itself enter into this or any other form of human information processing. This suggests that the term “conscious process” needs reexamination. Consciousness appears to be necessary in a variety of tasks because they require focal-attentive processing; if consciousness is absent, focal-attentive processing is absent. From a first-person perspective, however, conscious states are causally effective. First-person accounts are complementary to third-person accounts. Although they can be translated into third-person accounts, they cannot be reduced to them.Keywords
This publication has 191 references indexed in Scilit:
- The temporal structure of spoken language understandingPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Is the mind conscious, functional, or both?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1990
- Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989
- Misconceptions about influenceability research and about sociocognitive approaches to hypnosisBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1988
- Hypnotic behavior: A social-psychological interpretation of amnesia, analgesia, and “trance logic”Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1986
- Painstaking reminders of forgotten trance logicBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1986
- Electrodermal responses to words in an irrelevant message: A partial reappraisalBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1986
- Is blindsight an effect of scattered light, spared cortex, and near-threshold vision?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1983
- Visual function within the hemianopic field following early cerebral hemidecortication in man—I. Spatial localizationNeuropsychologia, 1978
- A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review, 1975