Guidelines for internal peer review in the cardiac catheterization laboratory
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- guideline
- Published by Wiley in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis
- Vol. 40 (1) , 21-32
- https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199701)40:1<21::aid-ccd6>3.0.co;2-d
Abstract
The Laboratory Performance Standards Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions has proposed guidelines for establishing an internal peer review program in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The first step is to establish a committee and a data base. This data base should include quality indicators that reflect: physician qualifications, outcomes of procedures, and processes of care. The outcomes must be risk-adjusted to account for the variable severity of illness. Data should be collected by catheterization laboratory personnel and entered into a laboratory-specific computerized data base. These data must be analyzed and organized into profiles that reflect the quality of care. Based on this information, the Committee would institute the following interventions to improve physician performance: education, clinical practice standardization, feedback and benchmarking, professional interaction, incentives, decision-support systems, and administrative interventions. The legal aspects of peer review are reviewed briefly. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 40:21–32, 1997.Keywords
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Obstacles to outcomes analysis in percutaneous transluminal coronary revascularizationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- Readiness for the scorecard era in cardiovascular medicineThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- Controlling Variation in Health CareMedical Care, 1991
- Medical informatics in the intensive care unit: state of the art 1991Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1991
- Assessing Peer Review in the Quest for Improved Medical Services: Part IIQuality Assurance and Utilization Review, 1990
- How Do Financial Incentives Affect Physicians' Clinical Decisions and the Financial Performance of Health Maintenance Organizations?New England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Medical Peer Review of Physician Competence and Performance: Legal Immunity and the Antitrust LawsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- The Effect of Concurrent Feedback in Reducing Inappropriate Hospital UtilizationMedical Care, 1982
- A Trial of Two Strategies to Modify the Test-Ordering Behavior of Medical ResidentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980