Twice-per-day fractionated high versus continuous low dose rate intracavitary therapy in the radical treatment of cervical cancer: A nonrandomized comparison of treatment results
- 1 July 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
- Vol. 32 (5) , 1425-1431
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(94)00484-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of spinal cord repair kinetics on the practice of altered fractionation schedulesRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1992
- High-dose-rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: High tech or high risk?International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1992
- Astro plenary: Interfraction interval is a major determinant of late effects, with hyperfractionated radiation therapy of carcinomas of upper respiratory and digestive tracts: Results from radiation therapy oncology group protocol 8313International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1991
- High-dose-rate afterloading technique in the radiation treatment of uterine cervical cancer: 399 cases and 9 years experience in TaiwanInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1991
- Fractionated high dose rate versus low dose rate regimens for intracavitary brachytherapy of the cervix. I. General considerations based on radiobiologyThe British Journal of Radiology, 1991
- The use of small fraction numbers in high dose-rate gynaecological afterloading: some radiobiological considerationsThe British Journal of Radiology, 1990
- The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapyThe British Journal of Radiology, 1989
- Chronic radiation damage in the rectum of the rat after protracted fractionated irradiationRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1986
- The application of the linear-quadratic dose-effect equation to fractionated and protracted radiotherapyThe British Journal of Radiology, 1985
- Dose fractionation, dose rate and iso-effect relationships for normal tissue responsesInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1982