When Individual Dispositions and Social Pressure Conflict: A Catastrophe
- 1 June 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Relations
- Vol. 33 (6) , 393-407
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678003300604
Abstract
When a personal dispositional variable is in conflict with social pressure, the resulting behavior is hypothesized to follow a cusp catastrophe. The catastrophe model allows'for discontinuities and bimodality in behavior. Specifically, when social pressure is low, behavior is expected to be a smooth, monotonic function of disposition. When social pressure is high and disposition is low, behavior will be low; when social pressure is high and disposition is high, relevant behavior will be bimodal-some people engaging in low levels of behavior and some engaging in high levels of behavior. In dynamic terms, shifts in dispositions at high levels of social pressure will result in discontinuous, i.e., "catastrophic" changes in behavior. Increments in social pressure at high levels of disposition will result in divergence, i.e., bimodality.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Catastrophe theory in social psychology: Some applications to attitudes and social behaviorBehavioral Science, 1978
- Nonlinear modeling of multistable perceptionBehavioral Science, 1978
- Catastrophe Theory: The Emperor Has No ClothesScience, 1977
- Toward a causal model of love.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976
- A MODEL FOR INSTITUTIONAL DISTURBANCESBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1976
- A MATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR CONFLICTING JUDGEMENTS CAUSED BY STRESS, APPLIED TO POSSIBLE MISESTIMATIONS OF SPEED CAUSED BY ALCOHOLBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1976
- Measurement of romantic love.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970
- Attitudes versus Actions: The Relationship of Verbal and Overt Behavioral Responses to Attitude ObjectsJournal of Social Issues, 1969
- Social influence as a function of attempted and implied usurpation of choice.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966
- Achievement motive and test anxiety conceived as motive to approach success and motive to avoid failure.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960