Selective attention is a primary determinant of the relationship between working memory and general learning ability in outbred mice
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Learning & Memory
- Vol. 14 (1-2) , 22-28
- https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.408507
Abstract
A single factor (i.e., general intelligence) can account for much of an individuals’ performance across a wide variety of cognitive tests. However, despite this factor’s robustness, the underlying process is still a matter of debate. To address this question, we developed a novel battery of learning tasks to assess the general learning abilities (GLAs) of mice. Using this battery, we previously reported a strong relationship between GLA and a task designed to tax working memory capacity (i.e., resistance to competing demands). Here we further explored this relationship by investigating which aspects of working memory (storage or processing) best predict GLAs in mice. We found that a component of working memory, selective attention, correlated with GLA comparably to working memory capacity. However, this relationship was not found for two other components of working memory, short-term memory capacity and duration. These results provide further evidence that variations in aspects of working memory and executive functions covary with general cognitive abilities.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variations in working memory capacity predict individual differences in general learning abilities among genetically diverse miceNeurobiology of Learning and Memory, 2005
- Ability Determinants of Individual Differences in Skilled PerformancePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2004
- Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by gIntelligence, 2004
- Of mice and mentalityNature, 2003
- Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligenceNature Neuroscience, 2003
- Working-memory capacity explains reasoning ability—and a little bit moreIntelligence, 2002
- Evidence for general cognitive ability (g) in heterogeneous stock mice and an analysis of potential confoundsGenes, Brain and Behavior, 2002
- Individual differences and a spatial learning factor in two strains of mice (Mus musculus).Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1998
- Intelligence and changes in regional cerebral glucose metabolic rate following learningIntelligence, 1992
- Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives.Psychological Bulletin, 1987