Where do we go from here? Environmental focus groups and planning policy formation
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Local Environment
- Vol. 4 (3) , 295-316
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839908725601
Abstract
Focus groups have achieved a profile in the analysis of public values unparalleled since the emergence of national opinion polls. While they have been used in a variety of public policy, academic and political settings it is their employment within the field of environmental policy, specifically the land‐use planning system, that is the focus of this paper. Using evidence from empirical research it is argued that the research‐policy interface of environmental focus groups and planning is currently both undertheorised and underpractised. Undertheorised in that much of the literature on focus groups concentrates on their conduct rather than how they can inform policy. Underpractised because focus group data are failing to have much impact on policy. This paper concentrates on the second of these propositions by showing that while some of the problems with quantitative public environmental values surveys can be overcome by focus groups, the nature and content of the data they produce are not easily assimilated by existing planning structures. In an era when the role of the public, in all its diversity, is being emphasised in policy circles, and collaborative projects between academia and policy communities on environmental issues are becoming increasingly commonplace, early warning signs of tensions between research findings and policy development need to be heeded. A failure to acknowledge these problems may well lead to impoverished environmental policy in planning, a further marginalisation of publics from policy processes and an unjust devaluation of the focus‐group method.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deconstructing Communicative Rationality: A Critique of Habermasian Collaborative PlanningEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1998
- Ethical issues in interviewing as a research method in human geographyAustralian Geographer, 1996
- Foundations for environmental political economy: The search forhomo ecologicus?New Political Economy, 1996
- A Discussion of “Women in the Field”: The Politics of Feminist FieldworkThe Professional Geographer, 1994
- Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research∗The Professional Geographer, 1994
- Coloring the Field: Gender, “Race,” and the Politics of FieldworkThe Professional Geographer, 1994
- Land, Limits and Sustainability: A Conceptual Framework and Some Dilemmas for the Planning SystemTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1994
- The methodology of Focus Groups: the importance of interaction between research participantsSociology of Health & Illness, 1994
- Gender Issues in the Use of Interviewing as a Research Method∗The Professional Geographer, 1993
- THE CORPORATE INTERVIEW AS A RESEARCH METHOD IN ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY∗The Professional Geographer, 1991