A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the WPPSI-R
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
- Vol. 8 (1) , 15-21
- https://doi.org/10.1177/073428299000800103
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the underlying factor structure of the WPPSI-R. Previous factor analyses of the WPPSI generally have supported a two-factor interpretation. Three separate maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analyses were performed on the WPPSI-R standardization sample (N = 1,700). A one-factor (general), a two-factor (verbal and performance), and a three-factor solution were imposed on the median intercorrelation matrix of the 12 WPPSI-R subtests. A comparison of underlying theory and goodness-of-fit statistics for the three analyses provided support for the two-factor solution as best representing the underlying structure of the WPPSI-R. The verbal and performance factors correlated highly, which indicates an underlying general component. The results lend continued support for the interpretation of separate Verbal and Performance Scales and for the interpretation of a Full Scale Score.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Confirmatory factor analysis of the Stanford-Binet Fourth Edition: Testing the theory—Test matchJournal of School Psychology, 1988
- Factor structure and specific variance of the WPPSI subtests at six age levelsPsychology in the Schools, 1981
- Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin, 1980
- A Factor Analytic Study of Wppsi Scores of Educationally Deprived and Normal ChildrenPsychological Reports, 1978
- Comparison of Two Criteria for Determining the Number of FactorsPsychological Reports, 1977
- Factorial structure of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence between the ages of 4 and 61/2.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973
- Factor analysis of the wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence (WPPSI)Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1973