Sense‐making activities and interpersonal conflict: Communicative cures for the mulling blues

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Cognitive and communicative activities directed toward understanding disputes in ongoing relationships are argued to influence perceptions of problem seriousness and partner responsibility. In the present study, results associated with major conflicts suggest mulling about disputes increases perceived severity of conflicts and the likelihood partners are blamed. Frequent communication activity and integrative interactions attenuated the negative effects of prolonged thought, whereas discussions characterized by distributiveness magnified the repercussions associated with conflict related thought. These relationships were not apparent in minor problem contexts, and avoidant behaviors during conflict interactions had no effect on the impact of mulling. Discussion of implications focuses on the impact of sense‐making activities on defining conflicts, conflict resolution strategies, and directions for future research.

This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit: