Trial of intensive compared with weekly speech therapy in preschool children.
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by BMJ in Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Vol. 67 (1) , 106-108
- https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.67.1.106
Abstract
Forty two preschool children referred to a speech therapy department were randomly allocated to receive intensive individual speech therapy or the more traditional once weekly approach. Boys and minority ethnic groups were referred most frequently. Speech therapy improved expression more than comprehension, as measured on Reynell scales. The mean improvements were 0.5 SDs (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.3 to 0.7) and 0.3 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.5) respectively. There was a greater improvement in children receiving intensive compared with weekly therapy in the expression scores (0.8 SDs (95% CI 0.5 to 1.1) v 0.2 SDs (95% CI -0.1 to 0.5]. White and non-white children had similar improvements in comprehension scores but white children had greater improvement in expression scores (1.1 SDs v 0.3 SDs). This difference was seen in both therapy groups. Randomised trials are useful in the evaluation of speech therapy in children.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomised clinical trials with clinician-preferred treatmentThe Lancet, 1991
- Trials and tribulations in speech therapy.BMJ, 1990
- The Outcomes Movement — Will It Get Us Where We Want to Go?New England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Delayed speech in children.BMJ, 1988
- The efficacy of intensive group speech therapy for inner city areasChild Language Teaching and Therapy, 1988
- The child who is slow to talk.BMJ, 1982