State Mental Health Parity Laws: Cause Or Consequence Of Differences In Use?
Open Access
- 1 September 1999
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 18 (5) , 182-192
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.18.5.182
Abstract
A new wave of state and federal legislation affecting mental health insurance was passed during the 1990s. Although patient advocacy groups have hailed the passage of numerous parity laws, it is unclear whether this activity represents a major improvement in insurance benefits or significantly increases access to mental health care. We investigated this issue with data from two new national studies sponsored by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. We found that states with below-average utilization were more likely to enact state legislation, but utilization in those states continues to lag behind the rest of the nation.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Employer‐Sponsored Health Insurance and Mandated Benefit LawsThe Milbank Quarterly, 1999
- Managed Behavioral Health Services for Children Under Carve-Out ContractsPsychiatric Services, 1998
- Costs and use of mental health services before and after managed care.Health Affairs, 1998
- How Expensive Is Unlimited Mental Health Care Coverage Under Managed Care?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- The Politics And Economics Of Mental Health ‘Parity’ LawsHealth Affairs, 1997
- The de Facto US Mental and Addictive Disorders Service SystemArchives of General Psychiatry, 1993