How Many Wolbachia Supergroups Exist?
Open Access
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Vol. 19 (3) , 341-346
- https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004087
Abstract
Obligate intracellular bacteria of the genus Wolbachia (Class Alphaproteobacteria, Order Rickettsiales) are currently divided into four taxonomic supergroups on the basis of clustering patterns in ftsZ-based phylogenetic trees (Werren, Zhang, and Guo 1995<$REFLINK> ; Bandi et al. 1998<$REFLINK> ). Supergroups A and B are found only in arthropods, whereas C and D are found only in filarial nematodes. The term supergroup has recently been employed to avoid confusion with designation of more closely related groups based on wsp sequences (Zhou, Rousset, and O'Neill 1998<$REFLINK> ). Wolbachia have generated substantial interest in recent years (Zimmer 2001), primarily because of the effects they have on their arthropod hosts, which include induction of cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI), parthenogenesis, feminization, and male-killing (reviewed in Stouthammer, Breeuwer, and Hurst 1999<$REFLINK> ). Estimation of the phylogenetic relationships within each supergroup has provided useful information about the evolution and biology of these bacteria. The phylogenies of both A and B members have been found to be incongruent with that of their hosts, strongly suggesting horizontal transfer (Werren, Zhang, and Guo 1995<$REFLINK> ). Recently, direct evidence for this phenomenon was found for parasitic wasps sharing a common food source (Huigens et al. 2000). Unlike the case of arthropods, the phylogeny of each nematode Wolbachia supergroup (C and D) appears to match that of their hosts (Casiraghi et al. 2001a<$REFLINK> ), although further gene sequencing studies are required to confirm this. Such phylogenetic congruence would suggest a strictly dependent relationship, and this idea is supported by evidence that removal of Wolbachia using antibiotics has negative effects on the filariae they reside in (Bandi et al. 1999<$REFLINK> ; Langworthy et al. 2000<$REFLINK> ).Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic treesBioinformatics, 2001
- Recombination confounds interpretations of Wolbachia evolutionProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2001
- Molecular identification of Wolbachia from the filarial nematode Mansonella ozzardiZeitschrift Fur Parasitenkunde-Parasitology Research, 2001
- A phylogenetic analysis of filarial nematodes: comparison with the phylogeny of Wolbachia endosymbiontsParasitology, 2001
- Infectious parthenogenesisNature, 2000
- Wolbachia Genomes and the Many Faces of SymbiosisPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- Effects of tetracycline on the filarial worms Brugia pahangi and Dirofilaria immitis and their bacterial endosymbionts Wolbachiafn1fn1Note: Nucleotide sequence data reported in this paper are available in the embl, GeneBankTM and DDJB databases under accession number AJ012646.International Journal for Parasitology, 1999
- Phylogeny of Wolbachia in filarial nematodesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1998
- Flavobacteria as intracellular symbionts in cockroachesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1994
- Phylogeny of symbiotic bacteria of four weevil species (coleoptera: curculionidae) based on analysis of 16S ribosomal DNAInsect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1992