Tacrolimus as secondary intervention vs. cyclosporine continuation in patients at risk for chronic renal allograft failure
- 11 August 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Transplantation
- Vol. 19 (5) , 573-580
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00389.x
Abstract
Abstract: Background: Chronic renal allograft failure (CRAF) is the leading cause of graft loss post‐renal transplantation. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus as secondary intervention in cyclosporine‐treated kidney transplantation patients with impaired allograft function as indicated by elevated serum creatinine (SCr) levels.Methods: Patients receiving cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression who had an elevated SCr at least 3 months post‐renal transplantation were enrolled. Treatment allocation was 2:1 to switch to tacrolimus or continue cyclosporine. This analysis was performed after 2 yr; patients will be followed for an additional 3 yr.Results: There were 186 enrolled and evaluable patients. On baseline biopsy, 90% of patients had chronic allograft nephropathy. Baseline median SCr was 2.5 mg/dL in both treatment groups. For patients with graft function at month 24, SCr had decreased to 2.3 mg/dL in the tacrolimus‐treated patients and increased to 2.6 mg/dL in the cyclosporine‐treated patients (p = 0.01). Acute rejection occurred in 4.8% of tacrolimus‐treated patients and 5.0% of cyclosporine‐treated patients during follow‐up. Two‐year allograft survival was comparable between groups (tacrolimus 69%, cyclosporine 67%; p = 0.70). Tacrolimus‐treated patients had significantly lower cholesterol and low‐density lipoprotein levels and also had fewer new‐onset infections. Cardiac conditions developed in significantly fewer tacrolimus‐treated patients (5.6%) than cyclosporine‐treated patients (24.3%; p = 0.004). Glucose levels and the incidences of new‐onset diabetes and new‐onset hyperglycemia did not differ between treatment groups.Conclusions: Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus results in improved renal function and lipid profiles, and significantly fewer cardiovascular events with no differences in the incidence of acute rejection or new‐onset hyperglycemia.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Post-transplant renal function in the first year predicts long-term kidney transplant survivalKidney International, 2002
- Different effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on renal hemodynamics and blood pressure in healthy subjectsTransplantation, 2002
- Strategies to Improve Long-Term Outcomes after Renal TransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- SIROLIMUS ALLOWS EARLY CYCLOSPORINE WITHDRAWAL IN RENAL TRANSPLANTATION RESULTING IN IMPROVED RENAL FUNCTION AND LOWER BLOOD PRESSURE1,2,10Transplantation, 2001
- Improved Graft Survival after Renal Transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996New England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathologyKidney International, 1999
- A COMPARISON OF TACROLIMUS (FK506) AND CYCLOSPORINE FOR IMMUNOSUPPRESSION AFTER CADAVERIC RENAL TRANSPLANTATION1Transplantation, 1997
- THE IMPACT OF AN ACUTE REJECTION EPISODE ON LONG-TERM RENAL ALLOGRAFT SURVIVAL (t1/2)1,2Transplantation, 1994
- LRISK FACTORS FOR CHRONIC REJECTION IN RENAL ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTSTransplantation, 1993
- Racial Differences in the Survival of Cadaveric Renal AllograftsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992