Missed myocardial ischaemia in the accident & emergency department: E.C.G. a need for audit?
- 1 June 1991
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by BMJ in Emergency Medicine Journal
- Vol. 8 (2) , 102-107
- https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.8.2.102
Abstract
Accident & Emergency Department Senior House Officers rely heavily on their ECG interpretation skills in the diagnosis and management of patients with chest pain. This prospective double-blind study was designed to test the accuracy with which Accident & Emergency Senior House Officers interpret ECGs, by comparing their interpretation with that of a Consultant Cardiologist. ECGs from 279 of 314 consecutive patients with chest pain were analysed. Ninety per cent of normal electrocardiographs and 57% of abnormal ECGs were correctly interpreted. Despite the inaccurate interpretation of 43% of abnormal ECGs, 96.5% of the patients in the study were considered to have been managed correctly. Audit of all ECGs recorded in the Accident & Emergency Department should be undertaken by someone with experience of ECG interpretation. New A&E staff should receive training in the interpretation of ECGs.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- General practitioners' use of electrocardiography: relevance to early thrombolytic treatment.BMJ, 1989
- Electrocardiographs in general practice.BMJ, 1989
- Can we improve on the diagnostic accuracy of chest pain in accident and emergency departments?1988
- Detection of Myocardial Ischemia/Infarction in the Emergency Department Patient with Chest DiscomfortEmergency Medicine Clinics of North America, 1988
- A Computer Protocol to Predict Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Department Patients with Chest PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Evaluation of Electrocardiogram in Emergency Room as a Decision-Making ToolChest, 1977