Forced cesareans
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 10 (6) , 465-468
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00001703-199812000-00006
Abstract
This review attempts primarily to provide guidance to physicians and others who may face the dilemma raised by a patient who refuses a recommended cesarean. This is, therefore, not a traditional literature review. The ethical-legal nature of the topic necessitates a different approach. Accordingly, this review briefly describes two recent cases in which courts have reversed orders to override a woman's refusal of consent, suggests different ways in which medical practice trends and emerging medical data may be implicated in forced cesarean cases, and then considers the implications of recent cases in the light of social-political factors.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perinatal HIV-1 TransmissionPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1998
- Is a rising caesarean section rate inevitable?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1998
- Posttraumatic stress reactions after emergency cesarean sectionActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1997
- Why we choose caesarean section: a prospective study.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1997
- Screening for prostate cancerBMJ, 1997
- Court-Ordered Obstetrical InterventionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987