Porcine valve durability: A comparison between Hancock standard and Hancock II bioprostheses
- 1 August 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 60, S216-S220
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)00255-j
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical and hemodynamic assesment of the Hancock II bioprosthesisThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1992
- Original expectations of the Hancock valve and 20 years of clinical realityEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1992
- Pathological considerations in replacement cardiac valvesCardiovascular Pathology, 1992
- Extended Follow-Up of the Standard Hancock Porcine BioprosthesisJournal of Cardiac Surgery, 1991
- Cardiac valve replacement in the elderly: Clinical performance of biological prosthesesThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1989
- The Hancock II porcine bioprosthesisThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1989
- Guidelines for Reporting Morbidity and Mortality after Cardiac Valvular OperationsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- The Standard Hancock Porcine Bioprosthesis: Overall Experience at the University of PadovaJournal of Cardiac Surgery, 1988
- Comparison of Hancock I and Hancock II BioprosthesesJournal of Cardiac Surgery, 1988
- Calcific degeneration as the main cause of porcine bioprosthetic valve failureThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984