Women in critical realist environmentalism: subaltern to the species?
- 1 February 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Economy and Society
- Vol. 26 (1) , 62-80
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149700000004
Abstract
Ecosocialism is developing in more and less anthropocentric directions, both of which make emancipatory claims, but arguably lack an adequate treatment of gender differentiation and inequality. The stimulus for this paper is the questionof whether bioethics, or non-anthropocentrism, is compatible with feminism and it is interrogated through looking at the gender implications of green critical realist theorizing of the concepts of species-being and species-life, alienation and ontological insecurity. It is argued that critical realism has yet to engage with feminist insights into the political dangers of naturalisms, the gendered and multiple identities of human subjects, the politics of domestic labour and reproduction, alienation theses and evolutionary models of social development. Taken together these suggest fundamental problems with the explanatory and emancipatory claims of critical realist environmentalism.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Women Encounter TechnologyPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2003
- Gender Inequality and Theories of JusticePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1995
- Human Capabilities, Female Human BeingsPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1995
- The Human Symbolic Revolution: A Darwinian AccountCambridge Archaeological Journal, 1995
- Frank Cass THE JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIESDevelopment and Change, 1993
- Women, resistance, and development: a case study from Dangs, IndiaDevelopment in Practice, 1993
- Development and Women's Emancipation: Is There a Connection?Development and Change, 1992
- Forced Identities: the State, Communalism, Fundamentalism and Women in IndiaPublished by Springer Nature ,1991
- Method in Social SciencePublished by Taylor & Francis ,1984