Tobacco Litigation as Cancer Prevention: Dealing with the Devil
- 23 January 1997
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 336 (4) , 304-309
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199701233360421
Abstract
Tobacco companies have come to personify the devil, and strategies to exorcise tobacco smoking from the United States proliferate. Tobacco's demonic status is even reflected in popular fiction. John Grisham's latest bestseller, The Runaway Jury, for example, is a broadside attack on tobacco companies. He opens the book by noting that tobacco companies “had been thoroughly isolated and vilified by consumer groups, doctors, even politicians.”1 This was bad, but it was getting even worse: “Now the lawyers were after them.”1 Physicians often see trial lawyers as predators, but choosing sides between lawyers and big tobacco has, at least recently, seemed . . .Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cowboys, Camels, and the First Amendment — The FDA's Restrictions on Tobacco AdvertisingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- The global cigaretteBMJ, 1996
- Preferential Formation of Benzo[ a ]pyrene Adducts at Lung Cancer Mutational Hotspots in P53Science, 1996
- The Cigarette Papers, Smokescreen, and Ashes to Ashes, reviewed by S. D. Sugarman * The Way Life Works, P. Szuromi * VignettesScience, 1996
- The Brown and Williamson documents. Where do we go from here?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Health Warnings, Smoking, and CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992