Postoperative complaints after spinal and thiopentone-isoflurane anaesthesia in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery Spinal versus general anaesthesia
- 1 February 1996
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
- Vol. 40 (2) , 222-226
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1996.tb04423.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Headache After Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean SectionAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1992
- EDITORIAL IIBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1991
- Intrathecal anaesthesia for day‐care surgery A retrospective study of 160 cases using 25‐ and 26‐gauge spinal needlesAnaesthesia, 1990
- An evaluation of a 30‐gauge needle for spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean sectionAnaesthesia, 1990
- Sprotte needle for intrathecal anaesthesia for Caesarean section: incidence of postdural puncture headacheAnaesthesia, 1990
- SPINAL ANAESTHESIA IN YOUNG PATIENTS USING A 29-GAUGE NEEDLE: TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND AN EVALUATION OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLAINTS COMPARED WITH GENERAL ANAESTHESIABritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1990
- Postoperative headache in young patients after spinal anaesthesiaAnaesthesia, 1987
- Spinal anaesthesia for outpatient surgeryAnaesthesia, 1985
- Antiemetic Efficacy of Droperidol and MetoclopramideAnesthesiology, 1984
- LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WHO RECEIVED 10,098 SPINAL ANESTHETICSJAMA, 1956