PROBABILITY AND DELAY OF REINFORCEMENT AS FACTORS IN DISCRETE‐TRIAL CHOICE
- 1 May 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 43 (3) , 341-351
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1985.43-341
Abstract
Pigeons chose between two alternatives that differed in the probability of reinforcement and the delay to reinforcement. A peck on the red key always produced a delay of 5 s and then a possible reinforcer. The probability of reinforcement for responding on this key varied from .05 to 1.0 in different conditions. A response on the green key produced a delay of adjustable duration and then a possible reinforcer, with the probability of reinforcement ranging from .25 to 1.0 in different conditions. The green-key delay was increased or decreased many times per session, depending on a subject's previous choices. The purpose of these adjustments was to estimate an indifference point, or a delay that resulted in a subject's choosing each alternative about equally often. In conditions where the probability of reinforcement was five times higher on the green key, the green-key delay averaged about 12 s at the indifference point. In conditions where the probability of reinforcement was twice as high on the green key, the green-key delay at the indifference point was about 8 s with high probabilities and about 6 s with low probabilities. An analysis based on these results and those from studies on delay of reinforcement suggests that pigeons' choices are relatively insensitive to variations in the probability of reinforcement between .2 and 1.0, but quite sensitive to variations in probability between .2 and 0.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- An empirical demonstration of risk-sensitive foraging preferencesAnimal Behaviour, 1980
- PREFERENCE FOR INTERMITTENT REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974
- COMMITMENT, CHOICE AND SELF‐CONTROL1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972
- Temporal effects of reinforcement: A negative “frustration” effectLearning and Motivation, 1970
- REINFORCEMENT OMISSION ON FIXED‐INTERVAL SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969
- Decision making by rats: Uncertain outcome choices.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1965
- Probability-Matching in the FishThe American Journal of Psychology, 1961
- Supplementary report: Two-choice behavior of monkeys.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960
- The relation between mean reward and mean reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959
- Some Comparative PsychologyThe American Journal of Psychology, 1958