A systematic review of intentional delivery in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
- Vol. 19 (3) , 177-187
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14767050500451470
Abstract
To evaluate the effect of intentional delivery versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM). We searched electronic databases and trials registries, contacted experts, and checked reference lists of relevant studies. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials comparing intentional delivery versus expectant management after PPROM, the gestational age of participants was between 30 and 36 weeks, and the study reported one of several pre-determined outcomes. Four studies were included in the meta-analysis. No difference was found between intentional delivery and expectant management in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) length of stay (LOS) (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.81 day, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.66, 0.04), respiratory distress syndrome (risk difference (RD) -0.01, 95% CI -0.07, 0.06), and confirmed neonatal sepsis (RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.05, 0.04). One study found a significantly lower incidence of suspected neonatal sepsis among the intentional delivery group (RD -0.31, 95% CI -0.50, -0.12; number needed to treat (NNT) 3, 95% CI 2, 8). Maternal LOS was significantly shorter for the intentional delivery group (WMD -1.39 day, 95% CI -2.03, -0.75). There was a significant difference in the incidence of clinical chorioamnionitis favoring intentional delivery (RD -0.16, 95% CI -0.23, -0.10; NNT 6, 95% CI 5, 11). There was no significant difference in the incidence of other maternal outcomes, including cesarean section (RD 0.05, 95% CI -0.01, 0.11). Intentional delivery may be favorable to expectant management for some maternal outcomes (chorioamnionitis and LOS). There is insufficient evidence to suggest that either strategy is beneficial or harmful for the baby. Large multicenter trials with primary neonatal outcomes are required to assess whether intentional delivery is associated with less neonatal morbidity.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Preterm premature rupture of membranes: diagnosis, evaluation and management strategiesBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2005
- Contemporary management of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM): A survey of maternal-fetal medicine providersAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- The timing of elective delivery in preterm premature rupture of the membranes: a survey of Members of the Society of Maternal-Fetal MedicineAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Delivery at 34 weeks is more costly than at 35 weeks in pregnancies with premature rupture of membranesThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2003
- Preterm premature rupture of the membranesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2003
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Antenatal Glucocorticoid Treatment and Cystic Periventricular Leukomalacia in Very Premature InfantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Premature rupture of membranes at 34 to 37 weeks' gestation: Aggressive versus conservative managementAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1998
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Intentional Delivery Versus Expectant Management With Preterm Ruptured Membranes at 30–34 Weeks' GestationObstetrics & Gynecology, 1995