THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TUMOR VOLUME AND THE NUMBER OF POSITIVE CORES IN MEN UNDERGOING MULTISITE EXTENDED BIOPSY: IMPLICATION FOR EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 174 (6) , 2164-2168
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000181211.49267.43
Abstract
We assessed the relationship between the number of positive cores obtained at extended biopsy and tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens as a tool for predicting the biological significance of prostate cancer from biopsy data. The study group included 207 men who were treated with radical prostatectomy without neoadjuvant therapy at our cancer center. All patients were diagnosed by systematic extended biopsy (10 or 11 cores) performed between 1997 and 2003. The variables analyzed were patient age, prostate specific antigen, clinical stage, biopsy Gleason score, maximum tumor length in a core, greatest percent of tumor in a core, total tumor length, total percent of tumor in all cores, positive core location, initial or repeat biopsy and prostate volume in subgroups based on the number of positive cores, that is group 1—1, group 2—2 and group 3—3 or more cores. Bivariate correlation analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis were used to determine the predictors of insignificant cancer. The number of positive cores was significantly related to total tumor volume (r = 0.433, p <0.001). Insignificant prostate cancer (volume less than 0.5 cc and Gleason score 6 or less) was found in 21.7% of patients (45 of 207). The incidence of insignificant cancer was 42.5% (31 of 73 patients) in group 1, 16.4% (10 of 61) in group 2 and 5.5% (4 of 73) in group 3. There was a significant difference in the incidence of insignificant cancer among the subgroups (group 1 vs 2 p <0.001, group 1 vs 3 p <0.0001 and group 2 vs 3 p <0.05). The best model for predicting insignificant cancer in group 1 was the combination of tumor length less than 2 mm, Gleason score 3 + 4 or less and prostate volume greater than 50 cc with 83.9% sensitivity (26 of 31 patients) and 61.9% specificity (26 of 42). The probability of insignificant cancer was directly related to the number of positive cores. Tumor length in a core, Gleason score and prostate volume significantly enhanced the prediction model for insignificant cancer in men with 1 positive core who underwent extended biopsy.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidemiology and statistical methods in prediction of patient outcomeScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 2005
- 5-YEAR URINARY AND SEXUAL OUTCOMES AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: RESULTS FROM THE PROSTATE CANCER OUTCOMES STUDYJournal of Urology, 2005
- Relating biopsy and clinical variables to radical prostatectomy findings: Can insignificant and advanced prostate cancer be predicted in a screening population?Urology, 2004
- DOES INCREASED NEEDLE BIOPSY SAMPLING OF THE PROSTATE DETECT A HIGHER NUMBER OF POTENTIALLY INSIGNIFICANT TUMORS?Journal of Urology, 2001
- RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SYSTEMATIC BIOPSIES AND HISTOLOGICAL FEATURES OF 222 RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS: LACK OF PREDICTION OF TUMOR SIGNIFICANCE FOR MEN WITH NONPALPABLE PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 2001
- A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SEXTANT AND AN EXTENDED 11-CORE MULTISITE DIRECTED BIOPSY STRATEGYJournal of Urology, 2000
- THE PERCENT OF CORES POSITIVE FOR CANCER IN PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY SPECIMENS IS STRONGLY PREDICTIVE OF TUMOR STAGE AND VOLUME AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, 2000
- Tumor Volume and Prostate Specific Antigen: Implications for Early Detection and Defining a Window of CurabilityJournal of Urology, 1995
- Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancerPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Staging of early prostate cancer: A proposed tumor volume-based prognostic indexUrology, 1993