Vaginal births after Caesarean (VBAC): a population study
- 9 October 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
- Vol. 14 (4) , 340-348
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3016.2000.00299.x
Abstract
This paper describes delivery outcomes for women from Victoria, Australia, who gave birth in 1995 and whose immediately previous (penultimate) delivery, within a 5‐year search period, was a Caesarean section. Because of the large numbers of records involved, dedicated computer software for record linkage was used to identify the previous delivery and link it with the woman’s current birth in 1995. Overall, 79% of the records from multiparous women were linked successfully. Approximately 15% were not linked because the previous birth was before the search period or was an abortion that would not have been reported to the Perinatal Data Collection Unit. Reasons for not being able to link the last 6% of the records include the previous pregnancy being overseas or interstate. Women who had a vaginal birth as the penultimate birth or a multiple birth at either event were excluded, resulting in a study population of 4663 linked records. More women (68%) had a repeat Caesarean than went into labour and, of the remaining women who laboured, 56% delivered vaginally. Overall, 18% of the women delivered vaginally. For the women who went into labour, the reported number experiencing a uterine rupture was two per 1000 births. Uterine rupture was not reported in the two‐thirds who did not labour but had a repeat Caesarean. A review of the perinatal deaths identified only two deaths, one baby being born by elective Caesarean and one by a vaginal birth after a previous Caesarean (VBAC) where the choice of delivery methods may have contributed to the death. This large study is one of the few in the literature to provide population‐based information on vaginal births after a previous Caesarean and related outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vaginal Delivery After Caesarean SectionAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2008
- Trial of labor or repeated cesarean section. The woman's choiceArchives of Family Medicine, 1997
- Data linkage methods used in maternally‐linked birth and infant death surveillance data sets from the United States (Georgia, Missouri, Utah and Washington State), Israel, Norway, Scotland and Western AustraliaPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 1997
- The Effect of the ACOG Guideline on Vaginal Births after CesareanMedical Care Research and Review, 1996
- Rates of Cesarean and VBAC Delivery, United States, 1994Birth, 1996
- The cesarean birth epidemic: Trends, causes, and solutionsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Trial of Labor: A Disciplined Approach to Labor Management Resulting in a High Rate of Vaginal DeliveryAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 1995
- Trial of Labor Following Cesarean DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 1994
- Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery Versus Trial of LaborObstetrics & Gynecology, 1994
- Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous cesarean sectionPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991