Women and Men in the Class Structure
- 1 March 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Family Issues
- Vol. 9 (1) , 27-50
- https://doi.org/10.1177/019251388009001003
Abstract
The stratification position of women is generally more complex than that of men. By the crucial class distinction of organizational power position, most women are either white-collar working class or blue-collar working class (order takers, not order givers). However, many women are involved in “Goffmanian labor” of presenting the frontstage image of an organization, with the result that they have a somewhat more “official” attitude than typical male working class, who are usually in a backstage position and hence are cynical of frontstage images. In the home, housewives do considerable surplus domestic labor, devoted to the production of symbolic status rather than material reproduction. Women's paid employment is often concentrated in the formal organizations producing and distributing cultural goods and status-laden objects; the leisure activities of wives of the higher social classes also concentrate in realms of symbolic status, including the arts and charity. The class cultures of women can be explained by their structural locations. Modern capitalism itself may depend heavily on the dynamic of producing and consuming status-laden material objects and hence upon female activities.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Class and Gender in Education-Employment LinkagesComparative Education Review, 1985
- Cultural Capital, Educational Attainment, and Marital SelectionAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1985
- Work for the Household: Its Nature and Consequences for Husbands and WivesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1984
- Social Class and Marital Attitudes and BehaviorJournal of Marriage and Family, 1982
- Family Status Production: The "Work" and "Non-Work" of WomenSigns: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1979
- Time Spent in HouseworkScientific American, 1974
- Bureaucratic Man: A Portrait and an InterpretationAmerican Sociological Review, 1971