Underuse of Coronary Revascularization Procedures in Patients Considered Appropriate Candidates for Revascularization
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 344 (9) , 645-654
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200103013440906
Abstract
Ratings by an expert panel of the appropriateness of treatments may offer better guidance for clinical practice than the variable decisions of individual clinicians, yet there have been no prospective studies of clinical outcomes. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients treated medically after angiography with those of patients who underwent revascularization, within groups defined by ratings of the degree of appropriateness of revascularization in varying clinical circumstances.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Indications for coronary revascularisation: guidelines for the NetherlandsHeart, 2000
- Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography, coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting: the ACRE studyJournal of Public Health, 1999
- The appropriateness of intention to treat decisions for invasive therapy in coronary artery disease in The Netherlands.Heart, 1997
- Referral for coronary artery revascularization procedures after diagnostic coronary angiography: Evidence for gender bias?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- The appropriateness of use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in New York StatePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- The appropriateness of use of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York StatePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- Audit of coronary angiography and bypass surgeryThe Lancet, 1990
- The appropriateness of performing coronary artery bypass surgeryJAMA, 1988
- The Appropriateness of Using a Medical ProcedureMedical Care, 1987
- Prognostic value of angiographic indices of coronary artery disease from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS).Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1983