Should All Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Microalbuminuria Receive Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors?
Top Cited Papers
- 6 March 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 134 (5) , 370-379
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-134-5-200103060-00009
Abstract
To determine whether response of albumin excretion rate to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has a threshold in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria and to examine treatment effect according to covariates. Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE and related bibliographies. Selected studies included at least 10 normotensive patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria, had a placebo or nonintervention group, and included at least 1 year of follow-up. Raw data were obtained for 698 patients from the 12 identified trials. Analysis of treatment effect at 2 years was restricted to trials with at least 2 years of follow-up (646 patients from 10 trials). In patients receiving ACE inhibitors, progression to macroalbuminuria was reduced (odds ratio, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.57]) and the odds ratio for regression to normoalbuminuria was 3.07 (CI, 2.15 to 4.44). At 2 years, albumin excretion rate was 50.5% (CI, 29.2% to 65.5%) lower in treated patients than in those receiving placebo (P < 0.001). Estimated treatment effect varied by baseline albumin excretion rate (74.1% and 17.8% in patients with a rate of 200 microg/min and 20 microg/min, respectively [P = 0.04]) but not by patient subgroup. Adjustment for change in blood pressure attenuated the treatment difference in albumin excretion rate at 2 years to 45.1% (CI, 18.6% to 63.1%; P < 0.001). In normotensive patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria, ACE inhibitors significantly reduced progression to macroalbuminuria and increased chances of regression. Beneficial effects were weaker at the lowest levels of microalbuminuria but did not differ according to other baseline risk factors. Changes in blood pressure cannot entirely explain the antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibitors.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Repeated measures in clinical trials: simple strategies for analysis using summary measuresStatistics in Medicine, 2000
- Effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or beta blocker on glomerular structural changes in young microalbuminuric patients with Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitusDiabetologia, 1999
- Effects of perindopril on renal histomorphometry in diabetic subjects with microalbuminuria: A 3-year placebo-controlled biopsy studyMetabolism, 1998
- Randomised placebo-controlled trial of lisinopril in normotensive patients with insulin-dependent diabetes and normoalbuminuria or microalbuminuriaThe Lancet, 1997
- The beneficial effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with captopril on diabetic nephropathy in normotensive IDDM patients with microalbuminuriaThe American Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Microalbuminuria is not rare before 5 years of IDDMJournal of Diabetes and its Complications, 1994
- Effect of Captopril on Progression to Clinical Proteinuria in Patients With Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus and MicroalbuminuriaJAMA, 1994
- A bivariate approach to meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- A general parametric approach to the meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986