A comparison of two models for calculating the electrical potential in skeletal muscle
- 1 November 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Biomedical Engineering
- Vol. 15 (6) , 591-602
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02364251
Abstract
We compare two models for calculating the extracellular electrical potential in skeletal muscle bundles: one a bidomain model, and the other a model using spatial and temporal frequency-dependent conductivities. Under some conditions the two models are nearly identical. However, under other conditions the model using frequency-dependent conductivities provides a more accurate description of the tissue. The bidomain model, having been developed to describe syncytial tissues like cardiac muscle, fails to provide a general description of skeletal muscle bundles due to the non-syncytial nature of skeletal muscle.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatial and temporal frequency-dependent conductivities in volume-conduction calculations for skeletal muscleMathematical Biosciences, 1988
- Model of electrical conductivity of skeletal muscle based on tissue structureMedical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 1986
- Electrical conductivity of skeletal muscle tissue: Experimental results from different musclesin vivoMedical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 1984
- Influence of intercellular clefts on potential and current distribution in a multifiber preparationBiophysical Journal, 1980
- Electrical properties of spherical syncytiaBiophysical Journal, 1979
- Simulation studies of the electrocardiogram. I. The normal heart.Circulation Research, 1978
- The Extracellular Potential Field of the Single Active Nerve Fiber in a Volume ConductorBiophysical Journal, 1968
- A Mathematical Evaluation of the Core Conductor ModelBiophysical Journal, 1966
- Specific impedance of cerebral white matterExperimental Neurology, 1965
- Linear electrical properties of striated muscle fibres observed with intracellular electrodesProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1964