Predictive accuracy and explained variation
- 25 June 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 22 (14) , 2299-2308
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1486
Abstract
Measures of the predictive accuracy of regression models quantify the extent to which covariates determine an individual outcome. Explained variation measures the relative gains in predictive accuracy when prediction based on covariates replaces unconditional prediction. A unified concept of predictive accuracy and explained variation based on the absolute prediction error is presented for models with continuous, binary, polytomous and survival outcomes. The measures are given both in a model‐based formulation and in a formulation directly contrasting observed and expected outcomes. Various aspects of application are demonstrated by examples from three forms of regression models. It is emphasized that the likely degree of absolute or relative predictive accuracy often is low even if there are highly significant and relatively strong covariates. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Problems and prediction in survival‐data analysisStatistics in Medicine, 1995
- Further results on the explained variation in proportional hazards regressionBiometrika, 1992
- A Comment on the Coefficient of Determination for Binary ResponsesThe American Statistician, 1992
- Explained Residual Variation, Explained Risk, and Goodness of FitThe American Statistician, 1991
- Measuring importanceStatistics in Medicine, 1990
- Measures of explained variation for survival dataStatistics in Medicine, 1990
- The explained variation in proportional hazards regressionBiometrika, 1990
- Measures of dependence for censored survival dataBiometrika, 1988
- Cautionary Note about R 2The American Statistician, 1985
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958