Identification and Quantification of Estrogen Receptor Agonists in Wastewater Effluents
- 14 August 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Environmental Science & Technology
- Vol. 35 (18) , 3620-3625
- https://doi.org/10.1021/es001254n
Abstract
Total concentrations of several known xenobiotic estrogen receptor (ER) agonists and natural and synthetic estrogen were measured in water by use of a combination of instrumental and bioanalytical approaches. Samples from 3 municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in south central Michigan (upstream and effluent); 4 point source locations on the Trenton Channel of the Detroit River, MI; and 5 locations in Lake Mead, NV were analyzed. Organic compounds were extracted from 5 L water samples using solid-phase extraction disks and separated into three fractions based on polarity. Whole extracts and fractions were tested for ER agonist potency using the MVLN in vitro bioassay. ER agonist potency was characterized by comparing the magnitude of induction elicited by the extract or fraction to the maximum induction caused by 17β-estradiol (E2). The greatest concentrations of ER agonists were associated with the most polar fraction (F3). Instrumental analyses and further fractionation were used to identify specific ER agonists associated with bioassay responses. Bioassay data were compared to extract concentrations in order minimize variability associated with the extraction procedure. Concentrations of endogenous estrogen, E2, and the synthetic estrogen ethynylestradiol (EE2) ranged from nondetectable to 14.6 ng/mL extract (nondetectable to 3.66 ng/L water) and represented from 88 to 99.5% of the total estrogen equivalents in the water samples analyzed. Concentrations of alkylphenols (APs) ranged from nondetectable to 148 μg/mL extract (nondetectable to 37 000 ng/L water). In general, alkylphenols contributed less than 0.5% of the total estrogen equivalents in the water samples. Both bioassay-directed fractionation results and comparison of ER agonist concentrations, adjusted for their known relative potencies, support the conclusion that E2 and EE2 were the dominant environmental estrogens in water samples from mid-Michigan and Lake Mead, NV.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Derivation and application of relative potency estimates based on in vitro bioassay resultsEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2000
- Analysis and occurrence of estrogenic hormones and their glucuronides in surface water and waste water in The NetherlandsPublished by Elsevier ,2000
- Instrumental and Bioanalytical Measures of Endocrine Disruptors in WaterPublished by American Chemical Society (ACS) ,1999
- Analytical Methods for Detection of Selected Estrogenic Compounds in Aqueous MixturesEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1999
- Evidence of Estrogen- and TCDD-Like Activities in Crude and Fractionated Extracts of PM10 Air Particulate Material Using in Vitro Gene Expression AssaysEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1998
- Exoestrogens: Mechanisms of action and strategies for identification and assessmentEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1998
- Organochlorine Compounds in Relation to Breast Cancer, Endometrial Cancer, and Endometriosis: An Assessment of the Biological and Epidemiological EvidenceCritical Reviews in Toxicology, 1995
- Simultaneous Measurement of Cytochrome P4501A Catalytic Activity and Total Protein Concentration with a Fluorescence Plate ReaderAnalytical Biochemistry, 1994
- Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs), Dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), and Dibenzofurans (PCDFs) as Antiestrogens in MCF-7 Human Breast Cancer Cells: Quantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipsToxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 1993
- Are oestrogens involved in falling sperm counts and disorders of the male reproductive tract?The Lancet, 1993